“In supporting the creation of new work, we have found Liz’s Lerman’s Critical Response Process to be the best tool we’ve ever encountered in assisting individual artists at the most vulnerable stages of creation. The Process empowers artists and invests responders with real responsibility as audience members.”
— James C. Nicola, Artistic Director, New York Theatre Workshop
Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process (CRP) is a widely-recognized method that nurtures the development of artistic works-in-progress through a four-step, facilitated dialogue between artists, peers, and audiences. In use for over 20 years, the Process has been embraced by artmakers, educators, and administrators at theater companies, dance departments, orchestras, museums and more. The Process has deepened dialogue between artists and audiences; it has enhanced learning between teachers and students. By extension it has proven valuable for all kinds of creative endeavors, work situations, and collaborative relationships within and beyond the arts, from kindergartens to corporations.
Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process, a brief overview
- The artist offers a work-in-progress for review and feels prepared to question that work in a dialogue with other people.
- One, a few, or many responders — committed to the artist’s intent to make excellent work — engage in the dialogue with the artist.
- The facilitator, initiates each step, keeps the process on track, and works to help the artist and responders use the process to frame useful questions and responses.
The Critical Response Process takes place after a presentation of artistic work. Work can be short or long, large or small, and at any stage in its development.
THE CORE STEPS
- Statements of Meaning: Responders state what was meaningful, evocative, interesting, exciting, striking in the work they have just witnessed.
- Artist as Questioner: The artist asks questions about the work. After each question, the responders answer. Responders may express opinions if they are in direct response to the question asked and do not contain suggestions for changes.
- Neutral Questions: Responders ask neutral questions about the work. The artist responds. Questions are neutral when they do not have an opinion couched in them. For example, if you are discussing the lighting of a scene, “Why was it so dark?” is not a neutral question. “What ideas guided your choices about lighting?” is.
- Opinion Time: Responders state opinions, subject to permission from the artist. The usual form is “I have an opinion about ______, would you like to hear it?” The artist has the option to say no.
Bring Dance Exchange artists trained in CRP to facilitate a session at your organization, institution, or school by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
Buy the book!
More about how CRP has enhanced artistic and working cultures:
“At Columbia College we have applied the Critical Response Process as a dimension of our classroom assessment program. The method has enhanced a culture already dedicated to high educational standards. Use of the Process has fostered values of reflection, collaboration, critical thinking, problem solving, mature feedback, respect, civility, and honesty—all vital for effective education.” – John Zubizarreta, Director of Honors and Faculty Development, Columbia College
“In making the transition out of the practice room, chamber and orchestra musicians sometimes struggle to find ways to enlarge their individually-oriented focus into a group dynamic that works for them. They need tools to achieve this. With the Critical Response Process and other innovative ideas, Liz Lerman challenged students in our ChamberFest program in entirely unexpected ways, enabling them to find and create their own tools.” – Bärli Nugent, Assistant Dean, Juilliard School of Music